Noticeboard

EditEdit InfoInfo TalkTalk
Search:    

Comments:

dont enter into this box:


  1. To do
  2. Title
  3. Logo, bigger
  4. Another edit button alternative
  5. Solved!
  6. No more green banner(?)

testtubes.jpg The PI Lab has new data requiring editors' attention...

How's that! I think I'll take it to the main site...


2009-09-11 17:30:05  

To do

- upload button icons (edit, talk...) —PerigGouanvic


2009-09-11 17:31:09  

Title

Feel free to change the title, but we can't have Philosophical investigation's lab, title is too long! ;-)


2009-09-12 23:16:09  

Logo, bigger

Yeah , I know, the logo is "pixelized"... we'll have to work on it... IF we want it larger. I do, personally, i like that. —P —PerigGouanvic

Another edit button alternative

contribute.png (normally, when it's saved, one can see it with a proper contrast, in the computer's file navigator)
— P


2009-09-13 10:31:55   I like the green!

the 'simplified' edit tabs go well with it too, although what about the two-tone concept for them? The size here looks good too.

Secondly taking out the black boxes makes it less clear that they are buttons - I'm not unhappy about balck boxes there anyway, sor tof interesting visually. Rounded corners - well, yes, worht experimenting with that.

The logo? Now I am sceptical about making it much bigger - a bit bigger maybe, but not too dominant. Basically the site exists to discuss these scientificky issues, and the more we emphasise the logo, the less we let the pages 'talk'. SO I think it is a 'risk' to go much larger than at present... Agaib, we should certainly experiment. I'll upload a better version of the logo file - if that helps - now.

Third thing will be to match in the colours for all the links, text etc. But I like the way the page background (which is a grey with a touch of green actually) harmonises. For example, the login yellow looks AWFUL now.

So look, let's stick with this green bar, put a mid-size logo on and fiddle with(fine-tune) the edit icons again. —docmartin

contribute2.png talkicon.png infoicon2.png

I can't track down the green colour used above, this is just an approximate one. But wouldnt it be better to do each design element in tables and then we can compare versions easier, take it a bit more 'methodically' etc?


2009-09-14 10:39:03   Beats me, these boxes (around images) just appeared and after half an hour trying to get rid of them (its NOT in the css or layout changes believe me!), I wonder if we need to delete the whole Wiki!

Or maybe go begging to Jabberwokky...!

ps this is TOO green now... bit sicky —docmartin


2009-09-14 10:44:21   At least I didn't bugger up the main wiki, eh! —docmartin

Solved!

I re-uploaded common.css - and the evil boxes are gone. But you can see the effect if curious by going back to the pages. —docmartin


2009-10-10 12:32:51   Not much happening, eh? Design dudes? —NormanNitram


2010-02-10 16:55:50   I'm back! —PerigGouanvic


2010-02-10 17:35:16   Hey! —PerigGouanvic


2010-02-10 17:35:49   (see ? that's what i was saying in 'new initiatives') —PerigGouanvic


2010-02-18 23:12:59   I gotta an idea for this... —docmartin

Er.. it didn't work! Complicated but I was wondering if we could access the 'recent changes info for HERE' while at PI proper...

Where's that jabberwokky when you need him....


2010-05-04 04:15:23   —— 2010-05-04 04:14:26   Who would like to have the "vanilla" colour as our background color for all the site?
here's what it would look like... very bright! but a similar, but less bright vanilla, would be interesting perhaps.

[[Image(vanilla.png, thumbnail)]] 
[[Image(vanilla2.png, thumbnail)]]

I just changed the css to obtain this color exactly (it's fdffdf). As I said, i'll try to find stg less flashy, easier on the eyes. —pg


2010-05-08 21:13:24   style and layout .css are now identitical to PI's.

things we could try and validate (or invalidate...):

font. Georgia (my preference)
page background color (i'd basically prefer to eliminate greys...)

eventually, the color of the green horizontal bar up there.

the thing is:most of the things i want to change are intended to make the site more "organic"... but there are good reasons to remain with greys and a character font that is more 'science-fascist'... i'm afraid that the two general views are not compatible...?


2010-05-20 20:17:27   Incompatible views will be EXTERMINATED!

<ref> Dr Who, 1970s </ref> —docmartin


No more green banner(?)

the previous ones (but with your previous comments in mind):vanilla.png
vanilla2.png


Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?"

new ones :
pibeige.png

pibrownish.png pibrownishandyellow.png

ratings? ideas?


2011-08-23 22:56:30   Go for it!

But you're right, it does look a bit greeny... —docmartin

In these three above ("new ones"), I hesitate between the first and the third. Is there one that you prefer? I'd say the first : beige banner, brown buttons (not the opposite)...... I'll go for the first one. — PG

This is a Wiki Spot wiki. Wiki Spot is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization that helps communities collaborate via wikis.